Neuronormativity, the pathologisation of Mental health, and the normalising of suffering

← Back to the blog


In recent years mental health has become more widely talked about, thanks to the popularisation of the “it’s okay not to be okay” trope. On the surface this is a wonderful approach to the normalisation of Mental health issues, but does it have a darker side?

There are currently over 300 “disorders” listed in the DSM 5, the diagnostic manual used by psychiatrists around the world. One could imagine that between them they account for the vast majority of human experience; a concerning thought to say the least.

What benefit does this serve us as a society?

Realistically, it only benefits those who adhere to normative standards.

We’ve been taught that mental health concerns are an illness, that we have a pathology that requires treatment. Despite this, there is no biomedical test that can definitively diagnose any of the numerous entries in the DSM. So perhaps there is something more to the pathologisation of human experience.

Our society is broken, it has fixed rules that apply to fewer and fewer people, while trying harder and harder to assimilate people into it’s normative standards of behaviour. Szasz would argue that this approach serves to provide a sort of social control over us.

So now we live in a society where anyone who doesn’t fit cultural standards of normal is considered “sick” or “ill”.

Thus, we reach a point of starting to understand why “it’s okay not to be okay” might have a darker side to it. Mental health issues (in my opinion) arise from living in an environment that can not fulfill the individuals needs. An environment that consistently traumatises those living in it.

However, we are now normalising human suffering. It’s okay to say “I’m not okay” but we must never normalise human suffering. When we do or say things that uphold the pathology paradigm, we are allowing our oppressive society to continue on its harmful path.

We need to do the work to rebuild society into a brighter place, thar meets the needs of the many, and not just a selected few. We do this by recognising that neurodiversity is about more than Autistic and ADHD experiences.

The change starts with us, and it ends with a brighter future.

It’s never okay to suffer.

Author

  • David Gray-Hammond

    David Gray-Hammond is an Autistic, ADHD, and Schizophrenic peer-support professional, independent academic, and multiply published award winningauthor and activist.

    David is CEO and founder of NeuroHub Community, and was name on the 2025/26 Diversity Power List, the top 50 DEI professionals in the United Kingdom.

    David works to bridge the gap between theory and practice through lived experience and academic inquiry.

    View David’s Links Here https://neurohub-david.start.page

Found this useful? NeuroHub Community is a small, neurodivergent-led organisation and much of what we share is free. If you would like to help keep it that way, you can support our work on Ko-fi, one-off or monthly, whatever suits you.

Keep reading

Hundreds more articles on Autistic experience, burnout, wellbeing and neurodiversity.

Browse all articles on the blog →


2 responses to “Neuronormativity, the pathologisation of Mental health, and the normalising of suffering”

  1. Reblogged this on On the Road Again.

  2. A powerful post which really motivates me to help and contribute to the change needed within society with regards to neurodiversity.

We welcome respectful discussion, shared experiences, and helpful insights โ€” your voice matters here.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Discover more from NeuroHub Community

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading